In re I.W.
Nicholas W. (Father) appeals from the juvenile courts order terminating his parental rights to his son, I.W. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26, subd. (c)(1).)[1] Father contends the juvenile court erred when it terminated his parental rights because I.W. would benefit from continuing a relationship with Father. ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) Latoya G. (Mother) joins in Fathers arguments to the extent that it benefits her. Court affirm the order.
Comments on In re I.W.