legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re K.T.
Michelle B. (mother) and Richard T. (father) appealed from an order of the juvenile court terminating their parental rights to their three children, K.T., Rickey T. and Michelle T., and establishing adoption as their permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26, subd. (c)(1).)[1] They claimed that the juvenile court's finding of adoptability was not supported by substantial evidence. After the juvenile court issued its order, the children were removed from their foster home. The parents and Child Welfare Services (CWS) requested that we reverse the judgment terminating parental rights because the adoptive placement failed and the children are no longer likely to be adopted. Court reverse and remand.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale