P. v. Guterres
On appeal, appellant claims that because she was not properly advised of her constitutional rights of confrontation and against self-incrimination, her concession of prior convictions is invalid. We conclude, under the authority of People v. Mosby (2004) 33 Cal.4th 353, 362-365 (Mosby), and the totality of the circumstances, that appellant freely and intelligently waived her constitutional rights because (1) the trial court partially advised her of such rights; (2) she had just confronted witnesses at trial; and (3) appellant had extensive experience with the criminal justice system. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Guterres