legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Middleton v. L&J Assets
Plaintiff and respondent Valerie Middleton got a Citibank credit card, bought things with it, and then stopped paying on June 5, 2001. She owed Citibank nearly $13,000. Defendant and appellant L&J Assets acquired the debt that Middleton owed Citibank. On June 2, 2005, L&J sued Middleton and her husband, plaintiff and respondent Matthew Livermore, for breach of contract. L&J also claimed that -- to avoid her creditors -- Middleton had fraudulently transferred to Livermore her ownership interest in the condominium where they both lived. L&J recorded a lis pendens against the property. While that lawsuit was pending, Livermore tried to sell the condominium. To complete the sale, about $37,000 had to be put into an escrow account. It was distributed to L&J on close of escrow. L&J then dropped its lawsuit.
Middleton and Livermore then filed this lawsuit against L&J for conversion and unjust enrichment. Based on a mistaken allegation in the complaint in the 2005 contract action, the trial court concluded that that lawsuit had been time-barred, and that L&J was not entitled to the funds it got from the escrow. The court entered judgment for Middleton and Livermore on both claims. Court reverse. L&Js contract action was timely. Court remand the matter for trial and a determination whether Middleton and Livermore can prove conversion and/or unjust enrichment.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale