Martinez v. Barker & Associates
This is the second time that the sufficiency of the allegations in appellant Esteban M. Martinezs first amended complaint is before this court. The first amended complaint alleged that appellants court-appointed attorneys mishandled their representation of him in a misdemeanor case and committed other wrongs. On appeal, Court conclude that appellant has not demonstrated that the superior court committed reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment of dismissal will be affirmed.
Comments on Martinez v. Barker & Associates