legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re E.U.
In this dependency case (Welf. & Inst. Code, 300 et seq.),[1]S.V., the mother of minor children E.U. and J.F. (Mother, E.U. and J.F., respectively), challenges an order of the dependency court that (1) vacated a previous order of the court and (2) terminated jurisdiction over the minors. The previous order had dismissed the section 300 petition that commenced this case.
The Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (the Department) challenged the dismissal of the petition. The Department asserted that termination of jurisdiction rather than dismissal was the proper final order. The trial court agreed, reinstated the petition, and terminated jurisdiction over the minors. Court find that termination of the courts jurisdiction over the minors was proper under section 350 and Court affirm the courts order.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale