legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Cesar H.
Appellant Cesar H., a minor, has been the subject of three juvenile wardship proceedings. In the first (proceeding No. 1), in June 2006 appellant admitted allegations that he committed three offenses, viz., disturbing the peace (Pen. Code, 415; count 3),[1]vandalism ( 594, subd. (a); count 4) and carrying a concealed dirk or dagger on his person ( 12020, subd. (a)(4); count 5), and that in committing each offense, he acted for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with, a criminal street gang, within the meaning of section 186.22, subdivision (d) with respect to counts 3 and 4, and within the meaning of section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(A) with respect to count 5. Later in June 2006, the court adjudged appellant a ward of the juvenile court, placed him on probation and ordered him committed to the Probation Youth Facility.
On appeal, appellant contends (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his adjudication of possession of a firearm in the most recent wardship proceeding, and (2) the court failed to declare whether each of the offenses of which appellant was adjudicated in proceeding No. 1 was a felony or misdemeanor, in violation of Welfare and Institutions Code section 702 (section 702). Court affirm.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale