P. v. Amezcua
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING; petition for writ of habeas corpus. Bob N. Krug, Judge. (Retired judge of the San Bernardino Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, 6 of the Cal. Const.) Petition denied. In a separate petition for writ of habeas corpus defendant alleges that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel[2]because his trial attorney did not call Elizette Morales as a witness, or have her declared unavailable and then present her prior testimony, and also did not introduce into evidence the prior favorable testimony of Ralph Robles and Sammy Perez. Court conclude, as Court explain below, that defendant has not made a prima facie showing upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, Court deny the writ petition.
Comments on P. v. Amezcua