In re N.V.
Delores V. appeals from orders terminating her parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to her young daughter and son.[1] Appellant contends the court erred by denying her petition to regain custody at the permanency planning phase. She also joins in arguments made by the childrens fathers in their respective appeals, In re N.V. (F054277) and In re R.V. (F054279). The father in In re N.V. (F054277) challenged the denial of a petition he brought to regain custody of his daughter N.V. Court concluded the court did not abuse its discretion because N.V.s father did not satisfy his burden of proof. The father in In re R.V. (F054279) claimed he was denied timely notice of the proceedings regarding his son R.V. Court concluded the court failed to conduct a paternity inquiry of the mother but under the circumstances the error neither violated his due process rights nor was it prejudicial. On review, we will affirm.
Comments on In re N.V.