P. v. Reynolds
The court found defendant in violation of a nondrug-related condition of his Proposition 36 probation, revoked his probation, and imposed the three-year suspended prison term specified in his plea agreement. Defendant appeals, contending the matter must be remanded because the court was unaware of its discretion to reinstate Proposition 36 probation. We find that, to the extent the court did not understand its discretion, any error was harmless. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Reynolds