legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Lawrence J.
In this dependency matter, L.J., the alleged father of three-year-old Lawrence J., appeals from (1) the juvenile courts May 1, 2007 order denying his petition for modification made pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 388[1] and (2) the courts July 27, 2007 order terminating L.J.s parental rights pursuant to section 366.26. Both appeals are based on L.J.s allegations that he received inadequate notice of the dependency proceedings. In particular, L.J. argues that the juvenile court erred in summarily denying his section 388 petition, that is, without affording him an evidentiary hearing on his petition. Court affirm the juvenile courts order denying L.J.s section 388 petition because the petition did not establish that it would be in Lawrences best interests to provide the relief L.J. sought and, even if it had, any error regarding notice was harmless. Court also dismiss L.J.s appeal from the subsequent order terminating his parental rights because L.J. was at all times an alleged father and, as such, lacked standing to appeal that order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale