Andrews v. Hill
Applying Probate Code section 18200,[1]the superior court allowed a judgment creditor to reach assets that the debtor, as trustor, had placed in a revocable spendthrift trust for her own benefit. The debtors primary argument on appeal is that section 15306.5 should have limited the amount available to satisfy the debt.
We hold that the court was correct in applying section 18200 without any limitation under section 15306.5. We also reject the debtors remaining arguments. At the same time, Court reject the creditors claims that the appeal be dismissed and sanctions imposed. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on Andrews v. Hill