legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Assn. Reconstruction Specialists v. Merit Property Management
Barbara Hughes discovered mold in her home located in the Bear Brand development (the development). A construction defect at the development was found to be the cause of the mold problem. Hughes sued various entities, including respondents Breakers at Bear Brand Homeowners Association (Breakers) and Merit Property Management, Inc. (Merit), based on alleged failures to properly remediate the mold problem in her home. Furthermore, neither ARS nor Breakers prevailed at trial on their claims for contractual indemnity. ARS vigorously pursued its cross complaint, and even expanded the scope of its claim at trial. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by concluding neither party was a prevailing party within the meaning of Civil Code section 1717.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale