P. v. Mariscal
Defendant, Adrian Salvador Mariscal, appeals from his convictions for first degree murder (Pen. Code,[1] 187, subd. (a)) and firearm possession by a felon ( 12021, subd. (a)(1)) and the jurors findings that he personally used a firearm causing death ( 12022.53, subds. (b), (c), (d), (e)(1)) and the killing was committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang. (186.22, subd. (b).) Defendant argues the trial court improperly: excluded evidence; admitted autopsy photographs; and denied his dismissal motion. The Attorney General argues an additional court security fee should have been imposed. Court affirm as modified.
Comments on P. v. Mariscal