In re K.S.
L.S. and Darnell W. appeal from juvenile court orders related to a permanency planning hearing involving L.s children K.S. and Jalen S. L. contends that the juvenile court erred in permitting the Alameda County Social Services Agency to recommend a permanent plan different than that agreed to in a stipulation approved by the court; she also challenges certain visitation orders. Darnell, a cousin raised with K. and Jalen, contends that the juvenile court erred in denying him participation in the dependency proceedings as a sibling. Court conclude that L.s claims are moot and Darnells claims are without merit.
Comments on In re K.S.