In re Marriage of Zinnel
The matter at hand is a sad case of a former spouse of a wealthy entrepreneur being unable to accept repeated claims that the sky was falling and that wealthy entrepreneur being unwilling to accept his duty to support his children in accordance with his earning ability. Both of the parties appear to live in a world of alternate realities and can only see the world through their narrow prisms. In reality, the sky did fall (the businesses failed) and the entrepreneur made no attempt to seek employment or start a new business, focusing his entire efforts to avoid having provable income available to pay support. . . . The one state of affairs that can be objectively determined is that the case is now on volume 20.
Fathers motions to strike mothers brief and her appendix are denied, as we have disregarded any inappropriate portions of those materials. The child support order is affirmed. Steven K. Zinnel shall pay Michelle M. Zinnels costs of this appeal.
Comments on In re Marriage of Zinnel