legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Seechan
A jury convicted appellant Chava Seechan of individual counts of attempted murder (Pen. Code, 187, 664;[1]count 1) and shooting at an occupied motor vehicle ( 246; count 2), two counts of assault with a semiautomatic firearm ( 245, subd. (b); counts 3, 7) and three counts of second degree robbery ( 211, 212, subd. (c); counts 4-6). The jury also found true enhancement allegations of the following: appellant committed each offense at the direction of, or in association with, a criminal street gang, with the specific intent to promote, further or assist in criminal conduct by gang members ( 186.22, subd. (b));[2]in committing the count 5 and 6 offenses he personally used a firearm, within the meaning of subdivision (b) of section 12022.53; in committing the count 1, 3 and 7 offenses he personally used a firearm within the meaning of subdivision (a)(1) of section 12022.5; and in committing the count 1 and 5 offenses, he intentionally discharged a firearm ( 12022.53, subd. (c)). On appeal, appellant contends (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the gang enhancement imposed in association with his count 4 conviction of second degree robbery, and (2) the abstract of judgment setting forth the determinate portion of the sentence to be served before the life sentence imposed on count 1 incorrectly stated a total of 45 years 2 months. Court reverse the true finding on the count 4 gang enhancement, direct the court to issue an amended abstract of judgment and otherwise affirm.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale