legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Baughn v. City of Salinas
Petitioner Brian Baughn was the prevailing party in a proceeding under the California Public Records Act (CPRA). (Gov. Code, 6250 et seq.) The trial court granted his attorneys fees motion but awarded him less than half of the almost $85,000 he had requested. Petitioner argues on appeal that the award was an abuse of discretion.
Court detect no abuse of discretion in the trial courts award of fees incurred for the prosecution of the CPRA petition. However, we find no reasonable basis in the record for the amount the trial court determined was reasonable for litigating the attorneys fees motion itself. Accordingly, Court reverse the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale