P. v. Gomez
Henry Neve Gomez (defendant) appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial resulting in his conviction of making a criminal threat. (Pen. Code, 422.)[1]In bifurcated proceedings, the jury found that he had a prior serious felony conviction that required a five-year enhancement and also qualified him for sentencing pursuant to the Three Strikes law ( 667, 1170.12) and that he had served a separate prison term for a felony ( 667.5, subd. (b)). At sentencing, the trial court denied his Romero motion. (People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497.) The trial court sentenced him to an aggregate term in state prison of 12 years. He contends that: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment, and (2) the trial court improperly excluded a 2001 act of violence by the victim, which denied him his Sixth Amendment right to present a defense. Court find the contentions to be meritless and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Gomez