P. v. Panyasy
Kham Panyasy appeals from a judgment of two years in prison. She contends that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to appoint an expert in Laotian culture to assist the trial court with sentencing. In a supplemental letter brief, Panyasy also contends that one of her convictions should be reversed because it is a lesser included offense of another conviction. For the following reasons, Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Panyasy