County of Shasta v. Gettings
Appellant Jimmy Lee Gettings, appearing in pro. per., appeals the denial of his 2006 motion to set aside a child support order entered in October 2003 and the denial of his 2006 recusal request. In essence, appellant is attempting to reduce his support obligation because his ex-wife purportedly interfered with his visitation and lived rent free in his house. We need not resolve the merits of his appeals because a litigant appearing in pro. per. is bound by the procedural rules of court, and his motions were untimely and procedurally defective. court remand the case, however, to the trial court to reconsider appellants application for a waiver of court fees. In all other respects, Court affirm.
Comments on County of Shasta v. Gettings