legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.L.
Juan L. and Veronica C. are the unmarried parents of L. L., a three-year-old girl. Juan L. appeals from the juvenile courts order denying modification under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388[1]and ending his parental rights under section 366.26. He claims that the court abused its discretion in denying his modification request to institute family maintenance services and vacate the hearing at which parental rights could be ended. He also claims, in essence, that the beneficial-relationship exception applies against the courts order ending his parental rights. Veronica C. appeals from the courts order ending her parental rights on the ground that there is no substantial evidence to support the order. The juvenile court relied on evidence that Veronica C. was incapable of safely raising L. L. because of her continued substance abuse and other problems and that Juan L., though not similarly afflicted, could not ensure that no harm would come to L. L. if she remained in his care. The court ruled correctly as it is the best interest of L. L. that governs in these circumstances, and Court affirm the orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale