P. v. Chambliss
Benhardt Chambliss appeals from his convictions of first degree murder, and assault with a deadly weapon. He claims instructional error, judicial misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct, evidentiary error, and sentencing error. We conclude the trial court had no sua sponte duty to instruct on self-defense or defense of others. We find no judicial or prosecutorial misconduct. The trial court did not err in admitting redacted evidence of statements appellant made following a polygraph examination conducted at his request. Finally, Court conclude there was no sentencing error. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Chambliss