P. v. Newell
Defendant Robyn Loree Newell pled no contest to fraudulent use of an access card (Pen. Code, 484g, subd. (a)), and receiving stolen property ( 496, subd. (a)).[1] In exchange for her plea, a charge of burglary/grand theft ( 459) was dismissed. Defendant was initially placed on probation but her probation was revoked for six violations of probation. The trial court sentenced defendant to two consecutive eight-month terms, to run consecutively with a principal term imposed in an El Dorado County case. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court abused its discretion by imposing consecutive terms and erred in imposing $298.21 of the $698.21 victim restitution order. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Newell