P. v. Raghunath
Defendant Dasarathi Raghunath appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate his 1992 pleas to a felony violation of Penal Code[1] section 647.6 and a misdemeanor violation of section 314.1. The motion alleged that the trial court and trial counsel failed to advise him of the immigration consequences of his pleas, which were now the basis of deportation proceedings against him. In a written order, the trial court denied the motion. Defendant timely appealed. We appointed counsel to represent defendant in this court.
Appointed counsel filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts but raises no specific issues. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument in his own behalf within 30 days. He has filed and we have reviewed his Appellants Supplemental Brief. Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have reviewed the entire record and considered the points raised in defendants brief. Having concluded that there are no arguable issues on appeal, Court now affirm.
Comments on P. v. Raghunath