In re S.F.
Appellants Maxine L. and Jay L. appeal from an order pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1]terminating their parental rights. We previously denied their petition (Cal. Rules of Court, former rule 38.1 [now rule 8.452]) to set aside an order terminating reunification services and setting the section 366.26 hearing. (Maxine L. v. Superior Court (Mar. 29, 2006, B188453) [nonpub. opn.].) They now contend the trial court erred in terminating their parental rights, in that the parental and sibling relationship exceptions to termination ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A), (E)) applied. Court disagree and affirm.
Comments on In re S.F.