Marriage of Turner
This is Jennifer Lorraine Turners second appeal regarding her purported interest in her ex-husbands stock options. In the first appeal, we rejected Jennifers claims she was not adequately compensated for her share of the Broadcom stock options Robert Edward Turner had obtained through his employment.[1](In re Marriage of Turner (Aug. 3, 2004, G032937) [nonpub. opn.].) We affirmed the trial courts order requiring Robert to transfer 4,474 shares to her account. The trial court determined the number of shares by using a calculation that took into account $68,857 for Roberts tax liability. In our prior opinion, we noted there remained an issue as to whether Robert actually incurred any tax liability in purchasing the shares, and we recognized this issue would soon be decided by the trial court. Our record showed the court had appointed a forensic accountant who would be asked to review the tax documents and determine if Jennifer was owed any additional money. (Ibid.)
Jennifers sole contention on appeal is the trial court erred in failing to adhere to our prior decision under the doctrine of law of the case. Court find her contention lacks merit, and Court affirm the postjudgment order.
Comments on Marriage of Turner