P. v. Dorado
Defendant Juan Jose Dorado (Dorado) appeals from a judgment after a plea of no contest to voluntary manslaughter (Pen. Code, 192, subd. (a)),[1]and first degree robbery ( 211, 213, subd. (a)(1)(A)). Dorados sole contention on appeal is that the trial court violated section 654 by imposing concurrent terms of imprisonment for these two counts. For the reasons expressed below, Court modify the judgment and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Dorado