P. v. Guerra
Appellant Joe Guerra stands convicted of assault with a deadly weapon on a peace officer, exhibiting a deadly weapon at a peace officer to resist arrest, and being under the influence of methamphetamine. The trial court imposed consecutive terms. Guerra contends the trial court should have stayed imposition of punishment on the brandishing offense pursuant to Penal Code section 654. He also contends the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by imposing consecutive terms and that counsel was ineffective in failing to argue for concurrent terms. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Guerra