legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Wright
After a court trial, appellant David Thomas Wright was convicted of first degree murder. (Pen. Code, 187, subd. (a).) The trial court found true the allegations that appellant committed the murder while engaged in the commission of sodomy ( 190.2, subd. (a)(17)), and that appellant had suffered a prior conviction of a serious or violent felony within the meaning of section 1170.12, subdivisions (a) through (d) and section 667, subdivisions (b) through (i). The trial court sentenced appellant to life in prison without the possibility of parole (LWOP).
Appellant contends, and respondent concedes, that the abstract of judgment must be amended to delete reference to a parole revocation fine pursuant to section 1202.45.
The oral pronouncement of judgment reveals that the trial court did not impose such a fine. In any event, such a fine would have been in error, since the trial court sentenced appellant to LWOP. (See People v. Oganesyan (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1183.) The judgment is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale