Elaine A. v. Super. Ct.
Elaine A. (mother) filed a petition for extraordinary relief, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.452, contending that the juvenile courts order denying her reunification services and setting a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 permanency planning hearing for her son, Ruben V. (Ruben), was an abuse of discretion because it is in Rubens best interest that she receive reunification services. In addition, mother argues that the juvenile court failed to properly consider Rubens sibling relationships. Court deny the petition.
Comments on Elaine A. v. Super. Ct.