legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Logix Development v. Faherty
Logix Development Corporation (Logix), D. Keith Howington and Anne Howington filed an action against multiple defendants, including appellant J. Roger Faherty, over disputes arising from a common venture involving pay per viewadult entertainment channels. The case went to trial against Faherty only as the alter ego of one of the corporate defendants, and the jury returned verdicts of $18,084,612 for Logix, and $4,457,234 in favor of the Howingtons. Court reject Fahertys contention that, as a matter of law, he cannot be held to be the alter ego of the corporate defendant in question. Court also find that the judgment in favor of Logix must be reduced by $12,548,510 and that the Howingtons recovery under the judgment must be reduced by $1,604,751. In all other respects, Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale