A criminal law decision regarding threatening to commit a crime resulting in death or great bodily injury and stalking.
|
A decision regarding intentional and negligent interference with prospective economic advantage.
|
A decision regarding legal malpractice, alleging Defendant settled Plaintiff's lawsuit against his former psychiatrist, "Dr. Roe,"[1] for substantially less than the value of the case.
|
A decision regarding declaring Appellant's minor son, free from his custody and control based upon abandonment.
|
A decision regarding termination of parental rights.
|
Appellant was granted primarily physical custody, and respondent received supervised visitation and was ordered to pay child support.
|
A criminal law decision regarding evading a law enforcement officer and causing injury, one count of child endangerment, and one count of transportation of a controlled substance. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on one count of second degree murder. Defendant appeals and raises numerous issues. Court affirm, except to strike one of the evading counts.
|
A criminal law decision regarding resisting an executive officer by the use of force or fear, attempted removal of a non-firearm weapon from a peace officer and possession of methamphetamine.
|
A decision regarding the suit alleged not only breach of the milk purchase agreement, but assorted additional claims for fraud, misrepresentation, and unfair business practices in connection with the purchase of the cheese plant.
|
A criminal law decision regarding voluntary manslaughter. Appellate counsel has filed an opening brief which summarizes the pertinent facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues and asks that this court independently review the record.
|
Appellant was convicted after jury trial on charges of child abuse and torture. He contends his convictions should be reversed on numerous grounds. The court rejected those contentions and affirmed the judgment.
|
A decision regarding conviction for murder and a multiple-murder special circumstance. Appellant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in propria persona. Court affirm the conviction and deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus.
|
A decision regarding an order denying motion seeking attorney's fees from qui tam plaintiff pursuant to the California False Claims Act, Government Code section 12650 et seq. (CFCA). Court affirm the order.
|
A disputes arose about work quality, change orders and resulting cost increases, and delays in completion, resulting in others being hired to complete the work. Plaintiff sued the sisters for breach of contract and related claims and the sisters cross-complained. After a court trial, the court found that the agreements were unenforceable because at the time they were made Defendant had not authorized Michelle to act as her agent and a later purported retroactive written authorization was too unreliable to be effective.
|
