CA Unpub Decisions
California Unpublished Decisions
A jury convicted appellant of one count of second degree murder in violation of Penal Code section 187, subdivision (a). The jury found true the allegation that appellant personally and intentionally discharged a firearm, causing death within the meaning of section 12022.53, subdivision (d). The trial court sentenced appellant to 40 years to life in prison, consisting of 15 years for the murder and 25 years for the firearm-use enhancement.
Appellant appeals on the ground that he was deprived of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel when counsel failed to request instructions advising the jury that evidence of the victim's antecedent acts of violence was justification for appellant to react more quickly and harshly. |
Appellant seeks review and reversal of a trial court order that calculated child support arrearages owed by respondent on the basis of a prior order which set the amount of child support at $500 per month. Appellant has failed to furnish us with a record that proves respondent had a greater monthly child support obligation. Court therefore affirm the judgment.
|
Following a jury trial defendant was convicted of petty theft with a prior conviction. Appellant was sentenced to a two year term in state prison, ordered to reimburse the county for reasonable costs of his appointed counsel, and pay a $200 fee for the collection of DNA samples from him, along with other fees and fines. In this appeal appellant argues that the order for reimbursement of attorney fees was improper without notice and a hearing, and imposition of fee for DNA collection was unauthorized by statute. Court agree and strike the orders.
|
In this appeal, appellant challenges rulings in two cases consolidated in the trial court. Appellant contends it was error for the trial court to grant summary judgment in favor of respondents on their claim for unpaid attorney fees, and to grant their motion to dismiss appellant's claim of legal malpractice. Court affirm the summary judgment, and reverse the dismissal of appellant's legal malpractice action.
|
Appellant entered a plea of no contest to charges of first and second degree burglary, grand theft, and theft from an elder or dependent person. Appellant also admitted he has three prior felonies, he knew his victim was over 65 years old, and he committed the current offenses while on bail. Appellant was convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of 16 years in state prison. Appellant appeals, and asks this court, pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, to examine the record and determine if it reveals any issues that deserve further briefing. Court done so, find none, and affirm the judgment.
|
Appellant appeals from a juvenile court order denying her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition and terminating her parental rights to her son. Appellant contends that the court abused its discretion in denying her section 388 petition for modification because appellant had successfully established a change of circumstances. Court reject this contention and affirm the trial court's order.
|
Minor appeals from the juvenile court's dispositional order committing him to CYA for a total term of 32 years to life for the felony murder and robbery of 17 year old child at the Pittsburg Marina in Pittsburg, California. Court affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
|
Appellant appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of attempted murder, and assault with a firearm. Appellant contends his conviction must be reversed because the prosecutor committed misconduct during final argument. Court reject this argument and affirm.
|
Appellants appeal the trial court's order awarding sanctions for discovery abuse in favor of respondents in the amount of $2,500. In the same order, the trial court also awarded sanctions for discovery abuse against appellants' attorneys, in the amount of $25,000. Court affirm.
|
Nicole F. appeals from a judgment terminating parental rights and freeing for adoption her now 11 year old daughter, nine year old son, and
seven year old son.Appellant contends the court should have applied the benefit exception to select a permanent plan other than adoption. Court find the record does not support her contentions and affirm the judgment. |
Actions
Category Stats
Listings: 77266
Regular: 77266
Last listing added: 06:28:2023
Regular: 77266
Last listing added: 06:28:2023