CA Pub. Decisions

1. PEOPLE v. VANG Part-II
   Dec 11, 2011
   An information accused defendant Chue Vang of violating Penal Code section 288, subdivision (b)(1)[1] (lewd and lascivious acts with a child under 14, accomplished by force, duress, or menace), on or about and between April 15, 2003, and December 31, 2004; the alleged victim was …
2. PEOPLE v. VANG Part-I
   Dec 11, 2011
   An information accused defendant Chue Vang of violating Penal Code section 288, subdivision (b)(1)[1] (lewd and lascivious acts with a child under 14, accomplished by force, duress, or menace), on or about and between April 15, 2003, and December 31, 2004; the alleged victim was …
3. In re TIMOTHY ELLIS ROSS on Habeas Corpus.
   Dec 11, 2011
   A modification decision.
4. TAYE v.DRUMGOOLE Part-II
   Dec 11, 2011
   Conservator Fessha Taye brought this litigation on behalf of conservatee Ida McQueen, a mentally and physically disabled elder, against several of McQueen's family members and the family's legal representative.[1] Specifically, it was claimed that these individuals violat…
5. TAYE v.DRUMGOOLE Part-I
   Dec 11, 2011
   Conservator Fessha Taye brought this litigation on behalf of conservatee Ida McQueen, a mentally and physically disabled elder, against several of McQueen's family members and the family's legal representative.[1] Specifically, it was claimed that these individuals violat…
6. SACKS v.OAKLAND
   Dec 11, 2011
   A modification decision.
7. In re the Marriage of CARI LYNN CADWELL-FASO and JOSEPH P. FASO
   Dec 11, 2011
   Family Code[1] section 1615, subdivision (c) (section 1615(c)), as amended effective January 1, 2002, creates a presumption â€
8. CALIFORNIA v.BANK OF AMERICA
   Dec 11, 2011
   A modification decision.
9. GREWAL v.JAMMU Part-II
   Dec 11, 2011
   Plaintiff Hardev Singh Grewal, a 73-year-old interpreter for the Alameda County Superior Court and a 39-year resident of Fremont, is a well-known member of the Sikh Temple, San Francisco Bay Area, who, he alleged, â€
10. GREWAL v.JAMMU Part-I
    Dec 11, 2011
    Plaintiff Hardev Singh Grewal, a 73-year-old interpreter for the Alameda County Superior Court and a 39-year resident of Fremont, is a well-known member of the Sikh Temple, San Francisco Bay Area, who, he alleged, â€
11. MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN CALIFORNIA v.SCHWARZENEGGER
    Dec 11, 2011
    A modification decision.
12. PEOPLE v.HOLLINQUEST
    Dec 11, 2011
    A modification decision.
13. PEOPLE v.CUA Part-II
    Dec 11, 2011
    Joseph Cua was convicted by jury of the murders of Fernand and Suzanne Wagner. He was connected to the commission of the offenses in part by genetic trace evidence. He challenges the scientific validity of that evidence, and contends that his trial attorneys were ineffective in f…
14. PEOPLE v.CUA Part-I
    Dec 11, 2011
    Joseph Cua was convicted by jury of the murders of Fernand and Suzanne Wagner. He was connected to the commission of the offenses in part by genetic trace evidence. He challenges the scientific validity of that evidence, and contends that his trial attorneys were ineffective in f…
15. WILSON & WILSON v. CITY COUNCIL OF REDWOOD CITY Part-II
    Dec 11, 2011
    In February 2003, the law firm of Wilson & Wilson (Wilson) brought an action against the City Council of Redwood City (City Council), the City of Redwood City (Redwood City), and the Redwood City Redevelopment Agency (Redevelopment Agency) (hereafter collectively the City) to cha…
16. WILSON & WILSON v. CITY COUNCIL OF REDWOOD CITY Part-I
    Dec 11, 2011
    In February 2003, the law firm of Wilson & Wilson (Wilson) brought an action against the City Council of Redwood City (City Council), the City of Redwood City (Redwood City), and the Redwood City Redevelopment Agency (Redevelopment Agency) (hereafter collectively the City) to cha…
17. PEOPLE v. HILL Part-IV
    Dec 11, 2011
    While patrolling San Francisco's Bayview District in an undercover capacity, Police Officer Isaac Espinoza was shot and killed and his partner, Officer Barry Parker, was wounded by David Lee Hill (appellant). Appellant's trial focused primarily on his motivation for shoot…
18. PEOPLE v. HILL Part-III
    Dec 11, 2011
    While patrolling San Francisco's Bayview District in an undercover capacity, Police Officer Isaac Espinoza was shot and killed and his partner, Officer Barry Parker, was wounded by David Lee Hill (appellant). Appellant's trial focused primarily on his motivation for shoot…
19. PEOPLE v. HILL Part-II
    Dec 11, 2011
    While patrolling San Francisco's Bayview District in an undercover capacity, Police Officer Isaac Espinoza was shot and killed and his partner, Officer Barry Parker, was wounded by David Lee Hill (appellant). Appellant's trial focused primarily on his motivation for shoot…
20. PEOPLE v. HILL Part-I
    Dec 11, 2011
    While patrolling San Francisco's Bayview District in an undercover capacity, Police Officer Isaac Espinoza was shot and killed and his partner, Officer Barry Parker, was wounded by David Lee Hill (appellant). Appellant's trial focused primarily on his motivation for shoot…