legal news


Register | Forgot Password

THE FLORIDA BAR vs. GREENE,

THE FLORIDA BAR vs. GREENE,
03:19:2006

THE FLORIDA BAR


vs.



RICHARD PHILLIP GREENE




Supreme Court of Florida






____________



No. SC04-1595


____________





THE FLORIDA BAR,


Complainant,



vs.



RICHARD PHILLIP GREENE,


Respondent.



[March 16, 2006]



PER CURIAM.


We have for review a referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by Richard Phillip Greene. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. We approve the referee's findings of fact, recommendations as to guilt, and recommended discipline. We disbar Greene for five years, effective, nunc pro tunc, April 1, 2004.




1. Facts


A federal grand jury issued a five-count indictment charging attorney Richard Phillip Greene and others with the following felonies: Count 1, conspiracy to commit mail fraud and securities fraud; Count 2, mail fraud; Count 3, mail fraud; Count 4, securities fraud; and Count 5, securities fraud. Greene pled guilty to Count 5, and the remaining counts were dismissed. The federal court approved the plea agreement and Greene was convicted as charged in Count 5. Based on his conviction, this Court summarily suspended Greene for three years, see R. Regulating Fla. Bar 3-7.2 (providing for the summary suspension of an attorney convicted of a felony under applicable law), and The Florida Bar (the Bar) filed a two-count complaint alleging that Greene had committed ethical violations based on the following offenses: Count 1, securities fraud and trust account violations; and Count 2, mail fraud. The Court referred the matter to a referee. Greene filed a motion to dismiss, which was denied, and the Bar filed a motion for summary judgment, which was granted.


The referee conducted a hearing on the issue of sanctions and made the following findings of fact:


1. Respondent was suspended by the Court on April 1, 2004, as a result of pleading guilty to his participation in a criminal conspiracy to commit securities fraud and mail fraud.


2. For a three year period from August 1999 to August 2002, Respondent acted as the securities counsel for MovieO Network, Inc. (â€





Description A decision regarding ethical breaches by attorney as security fraud.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale