legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Sharp v. City of Padadena

Sharp v. City of Padadena
11:13:2008



Sharp v. City of Padadena



Filed 10/27/08 Sharp v. City of Padadena CA2/5



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS









California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION FIVE



JANICE SHARP, et al.,



Plaintiffs and Appellants,



v.



CITY OF PASADENA,



Defendant and Respondent



PAUL ANDERSON and ELIZABETH ANDERSON, INDYMAC BANK,



Real Parties in Interest.



B201855



(Los Angeles County



Super. Ct. No. BS100584)



ORDERS MODIFYING OPINION



AND DENYING REHEARING



PETITION



[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]



The opinion filed September 25, 2008, is modified as follows.



1. On page 5, the first sentence of the first full paragraph is modified to insert after the word acquired the words:



a portion of



2. On page 5, delete the following sentence from the second full paragraph:



When Ms. Cilley and her spouse were unable to build on the property, they became engaged in litigation with Title Insurance & Trust Company (the title company).



In its place, insert:



Ms. Cilley and her spouse were unable to build on the property. Meanwhile, litigation commenced involving Title Insurance & Trust Company (the title company).



4. On page 16, in the first sentence of the second paragraph, between the words was and required, insert the word:



not



4. On page 18, the second full sentence of the first paragraph is modified to insert before Lot No. 6 the words:



a portion of



5. On page 18, the second full sentence of the second paragraph is modified to insert before Lot No. 6 the words:



a portion of



6. On page 28, the second full sentence of the third paragraph is modified to insert before Lot No. 6 the words:



a portion of



The foregoing modifications do not affect the judgment.



The rehearing petition is denied.



_____________________



TURNER, P.J.



______________________



ARMSTRONG, J.



______________________



KRIEGLER, J.



Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.



Analysis and review provided by Santee Property line attorney.



San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com





Description A modification decision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale