Sadeghi v. May Dept. Store Co
Filed 5/2/06 Sadeghi v. May Dept. Store Co. CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| ZAHRA SADEGHI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MAY DEPARTMENT STORE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents. | G035962 (Super. Ct. No. 04CC04567) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Sheila B. Fell, Judge. Affirmed.
Ali Parvaneh, Robert Sabahat and Michael C. Robinson, for Plaintiff and Appellant Zahra Sadeghi.
Forgey & Hurrrell, Thomas C. Hurrell, Lisa D. Collinson and Melinda Cantrall, for Defendants and Respondents.
Zahra Sadeghi appeals from the trial court's order denying her request for an award of attorney fees, following a judgment entered pursuant to a Code of Civil Procedure section 998 (section 998) offer of compromise. Sadeghi argues that because her compromised claims included one based upon a violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), she was entitled to an award of fees. We are not persuaded. Sadeghi's brief, which contains almost no citations to the record, and no analysis of her FEHA allegations or of any evidence which might support them, is simply insufficient to demonstrate the court had no discretion to deny her a fee award under the circumstances of this case. We affirm.
* * *
Sadeghi includes in her brief a section entitled â€
