Rumie v. Martinus
Filed 2/2/06 Rumie v. Martinus CA1/1





NOT TO BE PUBLISHED


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.




IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA





FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT




DIVISION ONE





JOSEPH RUMIE,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

SOLEDAD MARTINUS et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.
A108711

(San Francisco County

Super. Ct. No. 284138)


Joseph Rumie (hereafter Rumie) appeals a judgment dismissing his petition to recover title and possession of two parcels of real property in San Francisco and quieting title to one of the properties in An Van Vuong and Nu To Vuong and title to the other property in Gary Ji Wei Hall and Joanna Look. We affirm.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On December 9, 2002, Rumie filed a petition titled In re LeRue Grim Revocable Intervivos Trust in the probate department of San Francisco Superior Court. The petition listed as respondents An Van Vuong, Nu To Vuong, Hau Quoc Vuong (hereafter the Vuongs), Gary Ji Wei Hall and Joanna Look (hereafter the Hall-Looks), as well as other persons alleged to have a connection with the alleged trust or conveyances from the trust. It alleges that in 1984 Rumie entered into â€