legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Robinson v. City and County of San Francisco

Robinson v. City and County of San Francisco
08:17:2012





Robinson v






























Robinson v. City and >County> of >San
Francisco

















Filed 7/26/12 Robinson v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/4











>NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

>



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts
and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or
ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for
publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115>.







IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FIRST
APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION
FOUR




>






WENDY
ROBINSON et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY
OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Defendant and Respondent;

T-MOBILE
WEST CORPORATION et al.,

Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.










A132385



(San
Francisco City
& County

Super. Ct.
No. CGC-10-496711)

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

[CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]




THE COURT:

It is
ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 20, 2012, be modified
as follows:

1. On page 1, second sentence of the first full
paragraph, footnote 1 is deleted in its entirety, and all subsequent footnotes
shall be renumbered, so the sentence and newly renumbered footnote 1 reads:

The writ petition sought to
overturn the decision of respondent City and County of San Francisco (the City)
to permit real parties in interest and respondents T-Mobile West Corporation,
T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile Resources Corporation, and Omnipoint
Communications, Inc. (collectively T-Mobile) to place sets of wireless
telecommunications equipment on existing utility poles, including a pole
located near appellants’ homes.href="#_ftn1"
name="_ftnref1" title="">[1]



2. On page 14, in the second sentence under
“DISPOSITION,” the words “and the City” shall be inserted between the words
“T-Mobile” and “shall,” the word “each” shall be inserted between the words
“shall” and “recover, and the words “their respective” shall be inserted in
place of the word “its,” so that the full second sentence of the disposition reads:

“T-Mobile and the City shall each
recover their respective costs on appeal.”



This
modification changes the judgment.





DATED: ________________________ ______________________________

RUVOLO,
P. J.





id=ftn1>

href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1" title=""> [1] Appellants are a group of individuals who
reside near a particular utility pole on which T-Mobile installed a set of
equipment. We refer to them collectively
as Residents.








Description A modification decision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale