Regan v. LA Unif. School Dist.

Filed 2/21/07  Regan v. LA Unif. School Dist. CA2/8

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

            APPEAL from a judgment of the Los Angeles County Superior Court.  Richard  L.  Fruin, Judge.  Affirmed.

            Michael Regan, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

            Ivie, McNeill & Wyatt, Rupert A. Byrdsong and Damon M. Brown for Defendant and Respondent.

___________________________

SUMMARY

            Michael Regan appeals from an order sustaining his former employer's demurrer and the dismissal of the action.  We conclude the order sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend was proper, and affirm the ruling.  In addition, the action is independently barred by collateral estoppel and judicial immunity.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

            In August 2000, Regan filed his first action against his employer, Los Angeles Unified School District and several individuals (collectively, LAUSD).  (Regan v. Los Angeles Unified School District, et al. (Super. Ct. L.A. County, 2000, No. BC234541) [hereafter â€