Pollock v. USC
Filed 5/31/06 Pollock v. USC CA2/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| VICKI E. POLLOCK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent. | B186239 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS092698) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
David P. Yaffe, Judge. Affirmed.
E. Lyn Lemaire for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, J. Al Latham, Jr., Christina L. McEnerney for Defendant and Respondent.
___________________________________________________
Vicki Pollock was dismissed for cause from a tenured professorship in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the University of Southern California (USC). Pollock's dispute with USC has been the subject of three prior appellate proceedings, all of which were unsuccessful for Pollock. In this appeal, she once again challenges the fairness of having her academic fate decided by a panel comprised of USC faculty members.
As framed by Pollock, the â€
