Plummer v. Coen
Filed 10/12/10 Plummer v. Coen CA2/7
>
>
>
>
>NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts
and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or
ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for
publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115 >.
IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND
APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION
SEVEN
EDWARD
PLUMMER, JR.,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
LAVONNE
COEN, et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
B213723
(Los Angeles
County
Super. Ct.
No. KC052996G)
APPEAL
from a judgment of the Superior Court
of Los Angeles
County, Steven D. Blades, Judge. Reversed.
Tonsing
Law Firm and Michael J. Tonsing for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Edmund G.
Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Alicia M. B. Fowler, Senior Assistant Attorney General,
Michael E. Whitaker and Brue Reynolds, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff
and Respondent.
____________________________
Appellant Robert Plummer, Jr.
appeals from the judgment entered in favor of respondents Department of Health Services (DHS) and
Lavonne Coen after appellant's action was dismissed because he failed to
furnish security as ordered by the trial court pursuant to the vexatious
litigant statute Code of Civil Procedure[1] section 391.3. The trial court deemed appellant to be a
vexatious litigant under section 391, subdivision (b)(1) on the ground that in
the past seven years, appellant commenced or maintained five litigations that
had been â€
| Description | Appellant Robert Plummer, Jr. appeals from the judgment entered in favor of respondents Department of Health Services (DHS) and Lavonne Coen after appellant's action was dismissed because he failed to furnish security as ordered by the trial court pursuant to the vexatious litigant statute Code of Civil Procedure[1] section 391.3. The trial court deemed appellant to be a vexatious litigant under section 391, subdivision (b)(1) on the ground that in the past seven years, appellant commenced or maintained five litigations that had been †|
| Rating |


