People v. Lujan
People v. Lujan
02:10:2006
P. v. Lujan
Filed 2/3/06 P. v. Lujan CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Placer)
----
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ROLAND LAWRENCE LUJAN,
Defendant and Appellant.
C050203
(Super. Ct. No. 62043931)
Defendant Roland Lawrence Lujan pled no contest to threatening to commit a crime resulting in death or great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 422)[1] and admitted a strike allegation (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12). In exchange, two counts of the same type of offense, an own-recognizance allegation (§ 12022.1) and a serious felony allegation (§ 667, subd. (a)), were dismissed. Defendant was sentenced to state prison for six years, awarded 367 days of custody credit and 182 days of conduct credit, and ordered to pay a $500 restitution fine (§ 1202.4) and a $500 restitution fine suspended unless parole is revoked (§ 1202.45).
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. We received no timely communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE , J.
We concur:
SIMS , Acting P.J.
RAYE , J.
Courtesy of Tecate Business Lawyers (with http://www.mcmillanlaw.us.), and Tecate Lawyer Directory ( http://www.fearnotlaw.com)
[1] Further statutory references are to the Penal Code
02:10:2006
Filed 2/3/06 P. v. Lujan CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Placer)
----
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ROLAND LAWRENCE LUJAN,
Defendant and Appellant.
C050203
(Super. Ct. No. 62043931)
Defendant Roland Lawrence Lujan pled no contest to threatening to commit a crime resulting in death or great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 422)[1] and admitted a strike allegation (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12). In exchange, two counts of the same type of offense, an own-recognizance allegation (§ 12022.1) and a serious felony allegation (§ 667, subd. (a)), were dismissed. Defendant was sentenced to state prison for six years, awarded 367 days of custody credit and 182 days of conduct credit, and ordered to pay a $500 restitution fine (§ 1202.4) and a $500 restitution fine suspended unless parole is revoked (§ 1202.45).
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. We received no timely communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE , J.
We concur:
SIMS , Acting P.J.
RAYE , J.
Courtesy of Tecate Business Lawyers (with http://www.mcmillanlaw.us.), and Tecate Lawyer Directory ( http://www.fearnotlaw.com)
[1] Further statutory references are to the Penal Code
| Description | A criminal law decision on threatening to commit a crime. |
| Rating |
