legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Zhuk

P. v. Zhuk
08:25:2008



P. v. Zhuk



Filed 8/15/08 P. v. Zhuk CA3



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT



(Sacramento)



----



THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



DANIIL VALERIYEVICH ZHUK,



Defendant and Appellant.



C047365



(Super. Ct. No. 00F02479)



ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING



[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]



THE COURT:



It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 18, 2008, be modified as follows:



On the first line at the top of page 23, the word proscribes is changed to prescribes, so that the entire sentence, which begins at the bottom of page 22, reads as follows:



In making the determination as to the admissibility of the evidence presented, including declarations of jurors, the trial court must take great care not to overstep the boundaries established by Evidence Code section 1150, which prescribes the scope of evidence admissible to test a verdict.



There is no change in the judgment.



Defendants petition for rehearing is denied.



BY THE COURT:



BLEASE , Acting P.J.



RAYE , J.



Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.



Analysis and review provided by Santee Property line attorney.



San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com





Description A modification decision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale