P. v. Wise
Filed 8/13/10 P. v. Wise CA1/5
>
>
>
>
>
>
>NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
>
California
Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST
APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION
FIVE
>THE PEOPLE,
> Plaintiff
and Respondent,
>v.
>LONNIE WISE,
> Defendant
and Appellant.
A125386
( >Sonoma > County
Super. >Ct. > No. SCR547840)
Lonnie
Wise appeals from a judgment of
conviction and sentence imposed after he entered a plea of no contest to a
sexual offense requiring registration as a sex offender. (Pen. Code, §§ 220, subd. (a); 290.)[1] He contends the conviction should be reversed
because the trial court failed to advise him, before accepting his plea, of the
lifetime nature of the registration requirement. Based on the record in this appeal, we will
affirm the judgment.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Wise was charged with seven
counts of sex crimes perpetrated against â€
| Description | Lonnie Wise appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence imposed after he entered a plea of no contest to a sexual offense requiring registration as a sex offender. (Pen. Code, §§ 220, subd. (a); 290.) He contends the conviction should be reversed because the trial court failed to advise him, before accepting his plea, of the lifetime nature of the registration requirement. Based on the record in this appeal, Court affirm the judgment. |
| Rating |


