P. v. >Wilson>

















Filed 7/12/12 P. v.
Wilson CA3













NOT
TO BE PUBLISHED







California
Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 8.1115.





IN THE COURT OF
APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE
DISTRICT

(Shasta)

----






>

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY ROBERT WILSON, Defendant and Appellant.

C070445 (Super. Ct. No. 11F4958)

Appointed counsel for defendant
Anthony Robert Wilson asked this court to review the record to determine
whether there are any arguable issues
on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable
error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will
affirm the judgment.

I

Defendant used a
motor vehicle to evade law enforcement on June 6, 2011, driving with disregard for the safety of
other people and property. That same day
he was found in possession of methamphetamine.


Defendant was
arrested and charged with theft of a vehicle with a prior conviction for href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">stealing a vehicle (Pen. Code,
§ 666.5), evading an officer with disregard for public safety (Veh. Code,
§ 2800.2), possession of
methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)), href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">possession of a deadly weapon (former
Pen. Code, § 12020, subd. (a)), resisting a peace officer (Pen. Code,
§ 148, subd. (a)(1)), possession of paraphernalia (Health & Saf. Code,
§ 11364), and possession of a syringe (former Bus. & Prof. Code,
§ 4140). It was further
alleged that defendant served three prior prison terms. (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd.
(b).)

Defendant pleaded
guilty to felony evading a peace officer (Veh. Code, § 2800.2) and
possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd.
(a)). Defendant also admitted serving a
prior prison term. (Pen. Code,
§ 667.5, subd. (b).) In exchange
for his plea, the remaining charges and allegations were dismissed, and the People
agreed to a stipulated term of four years eight months in href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.com/">state prison.

The trial court
sentenced defendant in accordance with the plea agreement, ordered him to pay
various fines and fees, and awarded 316 days of href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">custody credit (158 actual and 158
conduct). Defendant appeals without a href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.com/">certificate of probable cause.

II

Appointed counsel
filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asked this
court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues
on appeal. (Wende, supra,
25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was
advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of
the date of filing of the opening brief.
More than 30 days have elapsed and we have received no communication
from defendant.

Having undertaken
an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would
result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is
affirmed.







MAURO , J.







We concur:







NICHOLSON , Acting P. J.







BUTZ , J.