P. v. Wilson



Filed 4/27/11 P. v. Wilson CA1/4





NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BRADLEY TERRANCE WILSON, Defendant and Appellant.

A128474 (Solano County Super. Ct. No. VC43333)

I.
Introduction
Bradley Terrance Wilson appeals from a judgment extending his commitment as a mentally disordered offender (MDO) pursuant to Penal Code section 2970.[1] Once again,[2] his attorney has filed a brief seeking our independent review of the record, pursuant to Conservatorship of Ben C. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 529 (Ben C.); People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) (see also Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738), in order to determine whether there is any arguable issue on appeal. Appellant's counsel represented in the opening brief that she wrote to appellant and advised him of the filing of a Ben C. brief, and his opportunity to file his own supplemental brief within 30 days after the filing of the opening brief. We have not received a supplemental brief from appellant.
Because Wende review is still not available under these circumstances, we will dismiss the appeal.
II.
Facts and Procedural History
As we noted in our prior opinion in case number A122358, â€