P. v. Wallace

Filed 8/16/06 P. v. Wallace CA1/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

LEVELL WALLACE,

Defendant and Appellant.

A110929

(Contra Costa County

Super. Ct. No. 0501445)

Levell Wallace appeals his conviction following a plea of no contest to possession of a firearm by an ex-felon. (Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (a)(1).)^[1] He contends the court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence and in ordering him to pay costs of appointed counsel.

BACKGROUND

The background facts are taken from the preliminary hearing. Uniformed Richmond Police Officers Amy Bublak and Martin Schoenberg went to 578 5th Street in response to a â€

Description	A decisoin regarding conviction following a plea of no contest to possession of a firearm by an ex-felon. Appellant contends the court erred in denying motion to suppress evidence and in ordering appellant to pay costs of appointed counsel.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.