P. v. Vo
Filed 11/18/08 P. v. Vo CA1/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM DUC VO, Defendant and Appellant. | A121330 (Solano County Super. Ct. No. FCR236875) |
Pursuant to a negotiated disposition, appellant William Duc Vo entered a plea of no contest to evading a peace officer causing injury (count 1, Veh. Code, 2800.3) and unlawful taking of a vehicle (count 3, Veh. Code, 10851, subd. (a)), in exchange for an indicated sentence of three years eight months and dismissal of remaining charges. Consistent with the negotiated disposition, appellant was sentenced to a low term of three years on count 1 and a consecutive eight months (one-third the midterm) on count 2. The remaining charges were dismissed.
Counsel for appellant has filed an opening brief raising no issues and asking this court for an independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. We have conducted the requested review and conclude that there are no arguable issues.
Appellant was represented throughout the proceedings by counsel. His plea was validly entered after full advisement of his rights and the consequences of his plea. There was no abuse of discretion in denying his motion to withdraw plea. Appellant was sentenced to the agreed-upon term and there was no sentencing error.
Judgment affirmed.
_________________________
Reardon, J.
We concur:
_________________________
Ruvolo, P.J.
_________________________
Sepulveda, J.
Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.
Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Property line attorney.
